By Neogen Corporation (NASDAQ:NEOG) reported a decline in revenue for the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, with total revenues of $217 million. Despite the challenging quarter, the company maintained its full-year guidance, citing expectations for improved margins driven by higher revenue and operational efficiencies.
Key Takeaways:
• Q1 revenues of $217 million, with core revenue decline of 1%
• Food Safety segment generated $159 million, down 4%
• Animal Safety revenues at $58 million, down 8%
• Adjusted EBITDA of $44 million, with a margin of 20.1%
• Company maintains fiscal 2025 guidance
Company Outlook
• Expects improved margins driven by higher revenue and operational efficiencies
• Anticipates stronger second half of fiscal year
• Maintains free cash flow guidance for fiscal year 2025
Bearish Highlights
• Core revenue decline of 1% due to foreign currency headwinds
• Gross margin down 260 basis points year-over-year to 48.4%
• Adjusted EBITDA margin down 280 basis points year-over-year
• Estimated $8 million impact on share headwinds for Q1, primarily in the U.S.
Bullish Highlights
• Solid position in food safety, benefiting from increasing regulatory scrutiny
• Growth in sales to distributors in Animal Safety segment
• Slight improvement observed in early Q2 compared to Q1
• Growth opportunities in Asia Pacific region, including Japan and Latin America
Misses
• Adjusted net income of $14 million, or $0.07 per share, down from $24 million and $0.11 in prior year
• Genomics revenue decline due to strategic shift towards larger production animals
Q&A Highlights
• Creation of Chief Commercial Officer role to enhance demand generation
• Ongoing portfolio reviews and capital allocation strategies
• Focus on high-return investments and potential consolidation of overlapping products
• Commitment to food safety amid recent industry outbreaks
Neogen Corporation reported a challenging first quarter for fiscal year 2025, with total revenues of $217 million and a core revenue decline of 1%. The Food Safety segment generated $159 million, a 4% decrease, while Animal Safety revenues were $58 million, down 8%. The company attributed the decline in Animal Safety to cyclical lows in the U.S. market, despite growth in sales to distributors.
CEO John Adent expressed frustration over unmet customer needs but highlighted improvements in efficiency and product availability since integrating the 3M business. The company reported adjusted EBITDA of $44 million, yielding a margin of 20.1%, down 280 basis points year-over-year due to lower revenue and gross margins.
Despite the slower start, Neogen maintains its fiscal 2025 guidance, expecting improved margins driven by higher revenue and operational efficiencies. The company anticipates a stronger second half of the fiscal year, with CFO Dave Naemura noting a slight improvement in early Q2 compared to Q1.
Neogen announced key leadership changes, including COO Doug Jones’s planned retirement in early 2025 and the search for a new Chief Commercial Officer. The company is also transitioning its operations structure to enhance focus on commercial activities.
During the earnings call, Adent discussed the creation of a Chief Commercial Officer role to enhance demand generation amid cyclical market challenges. He also addressed ongoing portfolio reviews and capital allocation strategies, indicating a focus on high-return investments and potential consolidation of overlapping products from the 3M acquisition.
The company highlighted growth opportunities in the Asia Pacific region, including Japan and Latin America, while acknowledging challenges in the Chinese market. Adent concluded by reaffirming Neogen’s commitment to food safety amid recent industry outbreaks, emphasizing the company’s role in ensuring food safety and its relevance in light of recent challenges faced by major companies in the industry.
InvestingPro Insights
Neogen Corporation’s recent financial performance aligns with several key insights from InvestingPro. Despite the challenging first quarter, InvestingPro Tips suggest that net income is expected to grow this year, and analysts predict the company will be profitable. This optimistic outlook supports Neogen’s maintained guidance for fiscal 2025.
The company’s recent stock performance has been turbulent, with InvestingPro data showing a 1-week price total return of -8.49% and a year-to-date return of -31.43%. An InvestingPro Tip indicates that the stock has taken a big hit over the last week, which is reflected in these figures. However, another tip suggests that the Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicates the stock may be in oversold territory, potentially presenting an opportunity for investors.
Financially, Neogen’s liquid assets exceed short-term obligations, according to an InvestingPro Tip. This strong liquidity position could provide the company with flexibility as it navigates the current challenging market conditions and implements operational efficiencies.
It’s worth noting that Neogen does not pay a dividend to shareholders, which aligns with the company’s focus on reinvesting in growth and operational improvements, as discussed in the earnings call.
For investors seeking a more comprehensive analysis, InvestingPro offers additional tips and insights beyond those mentioned here. The InvestingPro product includes a total of 8 tips for Neogen, providing a deeper understanding of the company’s financial health and market position.
Full transcript – Neogen Corporation (NEOG) Q1 2025:
Operator: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Neogen Corporation First Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. At this time, all lines are in listen-only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] This call is being recorded on Tuesday, October 10, 2024. I would now like to turn the conference over to Bill Waelke, VP, Investor Relations and Treasury. Please go ahead.
Bill Waelke: Thank you for joining us this morning for the discussion of the first quarter of our 2025 fiscal year. I’ll briefly cover the non-GAAP and forward-looking language before passing the call over to our CEO, John Adent, who will be followed by our CFO, Dave Naemura. Before the market opened today, we published our first quarter results as well as the presentation, with both documents available in the Investor Relations section of our website. On our call this morning, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful in evaluating our performance. Reconciliations of historical non-GAAP financial measures are included in our earnings release and the presentation. Slide 2 of which provides a reminder that our remarks will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks that could cause actual results to be materially different from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks include, among others, matters that we have described in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and in other filings we make with the SEC. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements. With that, I’ll turn things over to John.
John Adent: Thanks, Bill. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the earnings call for the first quarter of our 2025 fiscal year. At the beginning of September, we crossed the two-year anniversary of the closing of the 3M Food Safety transaction, which solidified our position as the largest player with the broadest product portfolio and geographic reach in an attractive and important end market. That transaction strengthened our company in the food safety end market where we generate approximately two-thirds of our revenue from products and solutions that help protect the food supply. We provide an important and relatively inexpensive line of defense in the rapid detection of contaminants in the production and distribution of food and beverages. We believe the food safety market has a number of secular tailwinds. One of these tailwinds involves the expected increase in various food testing regulatory requirements around the world. We saw another example of this recently in the U.S., with the USDA’s declaration of salmonella as a known adulterant in raw, breaded and stuff chicken products joining E. coli and Listeria as the other known pathogen adulterants in different food types. The USDA and other international regulatory bodies continue to focus on reducing severe illness and fatalities, stemming from foodborne pathogens, and we anticipate the emergence of additional regulatory requirements in the future. Other key tailwinds in the food safety market include the increasing expectation from consumers to know what is in and not in their food, as well as the high cost associated with contaminated products reaching the shelves. Beyond the obvious tragic consequences that can result from consuming contaminated food or beverages, the cost to companies of the associated product recalls, litigation, brand damage and even facility closures can be tremendous, as evidenced recently by several unfortunate high-profile outbreaks. These occurrences reinforce the value proposition of Neogen’s solutions and industry expertise, which have never been more relevant than they are today. Our commercial teams have been engaging in an increasing number of these conversations with customers, offering not only the breadth of our products and services, but also the long-standing knowledge and expertise we can provide in structuring robust food safety testing programs. We expect these factors to continue to support growth in the food safety end market and a continuation of the progress we’ve made in expanding and in some cases, winning back market share. In Animal Safety, we continue to manage through end market conditions we believe are at or near cyclical lows, particularly in the United States, where most of our business in this segment is focused. Our Animal Safety sales are influenced by net farm income, which after peaking in 2022 in the U.S. declined in ’23 and is declining again in 2024. The majority of our business in this segment goes through large distributors. And despite weaker conditions, sales of our products out of the distribution channel have continued to grow. However, our sales to our distributor partners are subject to movements in the timing of orders and inventory levels, as well as any other factors or initiatives specific to individual distributors. In the first quarter, some of our key distributors reduced inventory levels due to order timing from the fourth quarter. While others did so as a result of some specific challenges they’re experiencing in their particular business. We are not seeing the indications of a destocking trend and believe the sales out of our products support an improvement in our Animal Safety growth rates in the coming quarters. And of course, we’ll continue to monitor the channel dynamics closely. In our Genomics business globally, first quarter revenue was down on a year-over-year basis, but improved from the decline we saw in the fourth quarter. We began to round-trip the impact of the strategic shift towards larger production animals in the quarter and did see growth in our large animal business. This growth was offset by weakness in the companion animal side of the business, driven by a lower number of new puppies and increased inflationary pressure on customers. We are continuing to focus on driving growth in the direct-to-producer beef and dairy segments while also targeting actions to right-size the cost base to better align with the current level of revenue. With respect to our integration progress, the ERP-related challenges that we’ve been experiencing in our primary distribution center have been resolved, and we no longer are constrained by shipping. That being said, we do see opportunity to drive improvements in the efficiency of that operation, and our teams are focused on executing a number of initiatives there. On the production side, we’ve completed the relocation of the former 3M sample collection product line. While we’ve been in the process of ramping up our production, we haven’t been able to fully keep up with end user demand, which weighed on our sample collection sales in the quarter. We currently have all lines operational with the line of sight to reach normal production levels in the third quarter. Our new Petrifilm facility is progressing well and the first of our two major shipments of equipment is expected to land in Lansing in January. It will take several months to uncrate everything and get it moved into the new building, but the receipt of the equipment is clearly an important milestone in that process. With the recent shipping challenges behind us, regaining market share is the top priority. The response to our initial efforts in this area have been encouraging. We are a known and trusted partner in the industry with leading products that are globally validated and most customers are primarily focused on a demonstrated period of reliable supply. Because of this, share recapture will not happen overnight, but the progress we’ve made so far is in line with our expectations. Our commercial teams are executing detailed tactical plans that are driving constructive dialogue with previously impacted customers, and we’re looking forward to continuing to demonstrate our capabilities as a reliable, knowledgeable source of leading food safety testing solutions. I’ll now turn the call over to Dave for some more insights into our results for the quarter.
Dave Naemura: Thank you, John, and welcome to everyone on the call today. Jumping into the results, our first quarter revenues were $217 million. Core revenue, which excludes the impact of foreign currency, acquisitions and discontinued product lines, declined 1% for the quarter, while foreign currency was a headwind of 390 basis points compared to the prior year. The first quarter is historically our seasonally lowest of the year with this year’s first quarter seeing the impact of lost sales related to our shipping challenges in the second half of fiscal 2024. At the segment level, revenues in our Food Safety segment were $159 million in the quarter, a decrease of 4% compared to the prior year, including core growth of 1%. The core growth was led by the Indicator Testing, Culture Media and other product category, which benefited from strong growth in our Petrifilm product line as well as in Food Quality, Nutritional Analysis and Culture Media. This growth was partially offset by a decline in Sample Collection as we fell behind demand during the process of ramping up production in our own facility. The Bacterial and General Sanitation product category saw modest growth in Pathogens, which was offset by declines in General Sanitation and Microbiology. Within the Natural Toxins and Allergens category, modest growth in Allergens was offset by a decline in Natural Toxins. Quarterly revenues in the Animal Safety segment were $58 million, which includes a core revenue decline of 8% compared to the prior-year quarter. Within Biosecurity, strong growth in Rodent Control products was offset by declines in Insect Control and Cleaners & Disinfectants. The Vet Instruments and Disposables product line had a slight core revenue decline, while the Animal Care and other product category had a larger core revenue decline, driven in part by supplier-related product availability issues. Worldwide Genomics revenue was down mid-single-digits on a core basis. Solid growth in beef markets was offset by the shift away from small production animals in the U.S., the impact of which we have mostly anniversaried as of the end of Q1. From a regional perspective, core revenue growth in the first quarter was mixed. Growth was led by Latin America, which saw double-digit growth with a strong performance across most key product categories. The growth was driven by continued build-out of inventory across the distribution channel as well as some new business wins. Our business in Europe was roughly flat on a core basis, with growth in Petrifilm, Cleaners & Disinfectants, Culture Media and Vet Instruments, offset by declines in Sample Collection, General Sanitation and Genomics. Asia Pacific core revenue was down slightly on a year-over-year basis, with growth in Petrifilm, Cleaners & Disinfectants and Food Quality, offset by declines in Pathogens and General Sanitation. Our U.S. and Canada region saw the largest carryover impact from the shipment delays last year, with core revenue down in the mid-single-digit range. Despite this impact, Petrifilm and Culture Media had solid growth, which was offset by declines in most other Food Safety product categories. In the Animal Safety segment, strong growth in Rodent Control products was offset by declines in the other major product categories. Gross margin in the first quarter was 48.4%, representing a decrease of 260 basis points from 51% in the same quarter a year ago and an improvement sequentially due mostly to some reclass and one-time items that impacted Q4. Adjusting for transaction and integration-related costs as well as discontinued products, the year-over-year gross margin decline in Q1 was 90 basis points. The decline was driven primarily by lower volume and continued higher distribution costs. Adjusted EBITDA was $44 million in the first quarter, representing an adjusted EBITDA margin of 20.1%, a year-over-year decline of 280 basis points. The decline in adjusted EBITDA margin was driven by lower revenue in the quarter and the decline in gross margin, with additional negative impact from having the full cost to exit the various transition agreements, including some impact from higher shipping, a portion of which are reflecting in operating expenses. First quarter adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share were $14 million and $0.07, respectively, compared to $24 million and $0.11 in the prior-year quarter. The declines in the current year Q1 were driven primarily by the lower adjusted EBITDA. We ended the quarter with gross debt of $900 million, 67% of which remains at a fixed rate and a total cash position of $120 million. Compared to the fourth quarter, the lower first quarter cash position was driven by higher capital expenditures, a semi-annual interest payment on our senior notes and the negative impact from working capital. The working capital increase was the largest in payables, which is mostly timing driven and inventory where we built stock of higher running products. Q1 represented the high point in the year for CapEx spend. We believe we are still on track with the free cash flow guidance we provided in July but are off to a slower start than we had anticipated. Moving to our outlook for the 2025 fiscal year, we are maintaining our previously issued guidance. First quarter revenue developed in line with the expectations we communicated regarding lower-than-normal first half seasonality and we are encouraged by the performance we saw in September, which was an improvement over the first month of Q1. We expect our first quarter adjusted EBITDA margin to be the lowest of the year and expect margin improvement in the balance of the year to be driven by higher revenue volumes, gross margin improvement, including actions in our shipping and distribution operations, and operating expense efficiency. As I noted on capital expenditures, we anticipate our first quarter spending to be the highest level of the year, followed by the second quarter. We also continue to believe higher adjusted EBITDA combined with lower CapEx and the 3M working capital load-in not repeating will result in free cash flow for this year being positive. I’ll now hand the call to John for some closing thoughts.
John Adent: Thanks, Dave. In a separate announcement this morning, we shared that Doug Jones, our Chief Operating Officer, has communicated his attempt to retire in the early part of calendar 2025. Doug has had a long career across a number of industries and his experience has been a great value to Neogen, particularly his broad expertise and contributions to the integration of the 3M transaction. In preparation for Doug’s coming retirement, we have begun the search for a Chief Commercial Officer, who will report to me and have responsibilities for our global sales, marketing and communications organizations. With Doug assisting with the transition once that role is filled. Our new Vice President of Global Operations will transition to report to Dave Naemura, our CFO, who has worked closely with the operations team here at Neogen as well as other organizations in the past. This realignment will provide a dedicated focus on our commercial activities while also enabling Dave to work more closely with the operations and supply chain teams to further untap improvement opportunities. Our Head of Latin America also recently announced his impending retirement after a long career with Neogen, and we have hired his replacement, Enrique Carballido, who brings commercial experience from a number of multinational corporations in the diagnostics space, most recently as the Head of Latin America for Bio-Rad. Finally, we recently announced the addition of a new member of our Board, Thierry Bernard, who is the current CEO of QIAGEN, a leading global provider of molecular diagnostic solutions and insights. This addition brings the valuable insights and perspectives of an independent public company CEO to our Board, including those gained from experience in the food safety industry in prior roles. The goal of these additions and organizational realignments is to continue to bring experience and capabilities in the Neogen that puts us in the best position to execute on the significant opportunities we have in our primary end market of food safety. We are the established leader in this market and look forward to continuing to build on that position to drive sustainable long-term growth. Now, I’ll turn things over to the operator to begin the Q&A.
Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from David Westenberg with Piper Sandler. Your line is now open.
David Westenberg: Hey, guys. Thank you for taking the question. So, you’ve had 3M for a little while now, and there’s definitely some great products that fit with your overall portfolio. How are you looking at maybe investments this year in sales and marketing, R&D, et cetera, in terms of allocation towards food safety overall, now that you have this new toys in the portfolio?
Dave Naemura: Hi, David, it’s Dave. Good question. I think what you’ve heard from us over the last year is a couple of things. A lot of commercial investment, particularly building out the international regions. We think there continues to be a lot of opportunity. And now that we have critical mass post 3M acquisition, we’ve been putting a lot of energy there. And also, you’ve heard us talk about Petrifilm as a platform. It’s very exciting, and clearly, an R&D priority for us to invest in. And of course, in Q1, announced the new reader as well, the new feeder for higher volume processing. So, I think you’ve heard that from us and your take is right. It’s very exciting. And I think hopefully, you’ll continue — we’ll continue on that theme.
John Adent: Yeah. Thanks, David. We’ve talked a lot about capital allocation, right, and where we’re going to spend our money, and it’s something we do and look at as a group and understand. And we see the profitability profile of those products and really a number of our other products in the food safety, and that’s where we’re going to continue to invest. It was the thesis of the deal. That’s why we’re still excited about the deal. That’s why we’re going to continue to put money behind it.
David Westenberg: Definitely sounds right. And then, in terms of debt and how we’re thinking about debt over the course of the next three years, I know you don’t give three-year, four-year outyear guidance, but just in terms of the priority to pay debt down, I still think that is a big capital priority for you, though I know you guys continue to think about tuck-ins on a pretty ongoing basis.
John Adent: Yeah. Look, I think you’ve heard us consistently talk about capital allocation priority, first funding the integration, which is vital, but then on a net basis, reducing leverage. And as we do so, that frees up M&A capacity, right? So, I think, no change there. We got to keep getting the integration work done, which we made, obviously, huge strides in 2024. And as the years progress here, we think we’ll be on an okay path. The guide implies around 3 times net leverage at the end of the year, of the fiscal year, a little higher than where we thought we would be a few years ago at this time, but clearly manageable and I think reflective of our priorities.
David Westenberg: Perfect. And then just one last one here. The stock out of the Petrifilm, that is now well behind you. Can you talk about the customer recovery ratio, what kind of inning you are in terms of winning all those back? Is there still a big group that you have left to win back, or did you get them pretty much all back over the last, say, year or so when — now that you’ve had product on a pretty consistent basis? And that’s my last one. Thank you.
John Adent: Yeah. I think — thanks, David. I think, there’s two pieces of this. One is Petrifilm specifically, which is what you asked about, in Japan, where we had the major issues, we’ve won those customers back, right? And we’re actually seeing growth in Japan. I mean that’s been a good story for us. I mean that was — I think we had multiple quarters of decline, and we finally start to see that business turn around and return to growth, and it’s a really strong team. I think on the broader business where we struggled a little bit for a couple of quarters regarding our EWM system at the warehouse and hurt customers, that continues to be a focus for us to win those customers back. That’s going to take a little bit longer. We knew that we need to rebuild trust. I’ve had a number of discussions with customers. And like I said in my opening remarks, what they want to see is consistent supply, we’ve done that for a quarter, and they want to see us do it again. And so, we’re still on that journey. That’s why we talked about for the year, how it was going to pace out, maybe first quarter was going to be our lowest and going to be a challenge for us, but we understood that and we think that we’re on the right track.
David Westenberg: Thank you.
Operator: Your next question comes from Brandon Vazquez with William Blair. Your line is now open.
Brandon Vazquez: Hey, good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking the question. Can we — let’s maybe start on the customer losses that you guys were just touching on. John, are you able to quantify at all what the customer losses were over the past couple of quarters? I know when you guys lost customers in Japan, you were able to give us a number. So, curious if you can quantify it at all. And then, maybe just spend a couple more minutes talking about when you’re sitting down with these accounts, what are they saying in terms of what they want to see from you consistently, and then if you’re getting a good sense that once I show them one or two quarters of supply, they will come back predominantly for most of the share losses that you kind of lost in those accounts.
Dave Naemura: Hey, Brandon, it’s Dave. Just real quick maybe quantifying a little bit. As we entered the year, you’ll recall, we talked about what we thought the share headwind would be is a couple of points — at least a couple of points of growth for the year. I think what we saw in the first quarter was reasonably consistent with that. The data we look at, we think our share — kind of share headwind impact was about $8 million in the first quarter. That was globally the majority of that in the U.S. And I’ll let John talk to kind of the customer interaction and how this is coming along.
John Adent: Yeah, thanks, Dave. So, Brandon, a lot of discussion with the customers I have is, first, they want to express to me their frustration, right? And so — and I tell them, there’s no one more frustrated than me in the way that we were not able to meet their needs. Pretty much right after that, we talk about what are the things that we’ve done and the improvements we’ve seen. So, we share that with them. I’ll give you a good example. One is regarding MDS. We’ve already have efficiency improvements in that line in six months being under our roof than when it was in 3M. And I think that’s what gives me a lot of excitement is we spent a lot of time and energy in the last two years of working on integration to carve the business out and bring it into ours. And now what we’re starting — significant teams in Neogen are starting to refocus that energy and time from integration efforts to efficiency and growth efforts, which is what I’m really excited to see the team do. I can show those points to customers. I show them the Petrifilm, how we’ve increased the availability of the product line. I can show them the efficiency in MDS. I can show them the progress we’re making. And those are the things that allow us to continue to have discussions. The majority of the time, it’s, listen, we have a discussion and then we resign the contract. Those are the way that those — a lot of those discussions have been progressing.
Brandon Vazquez: Okay. Great. And Dave, maybe back to you now with one quarter under the belt and maybe one month under the belt into the next quarter and knowing the conversations that you’re having with customers at this point, just curious if there’s any — you have a range out there for guidance for the year. Curious if conversations are leaning in towards one way or another on the range or even if you could just talk about what gets you to the high and the low end of those ranges through the rest of the year.
Dave Naemura: Yeah. Thanks, Brandon. I think you’re just with the first quarter behind us and yes, a view of September, which for a first month of the quarter, we saw some improvement for the first month of Q2 versus Q1. I don’t think it informs that we would narrow the range per se. There’s still uncertainty around the timing and pace of share recovery. There’s uncertainty more broadly in our end markets. And so, I think the things we talked about when we set the guide kind of still exist kind of one quarter in here. And most importantly, when we talked about the guide, we talked about this year being a little more second-half weighted. So historically, maybe we’d be 48% in the first half, 52% in the second, and we see that shifting to a little more second-half weighted, which I think creates the need for the volume ramp makes it a little bit bigger. So, I think we still remain where we are. And to your point, as the year develops here, hopefully, we can help color it a little better.
Brandon Vazquez: Okay. And maybe I’ll throw two quick ones out there. John, is there any feedback in the early days of the high-volume Petrifilm feeder that you could share with us at this point? And then, Dave, just for you, just so that we can kind of talk about it on the broad call, any impacts that we should keep in mind from the past two hurricanes in the Southeast? Thanks, guys.
John Adent: I only have one anecdotal story, Brandon, where we had a customer that was testing it and we said, “Okay, it’s time to take it back,” and he said, “There’s no way you’re taking it back.” So that’s my one anecdotal story. I think if I could add something else, this quarter has been challenging for us as an industry. If you think about relevancy of our business, we’ve had two major outbreaks with major companies that have had devastating impact on their consumers. And it just goes to show what we do and why we’re important. And one of the things I’ll tell you is we had a meeting where one thing we did for our research, our tech service teams, was like we put up the number of people that were affected by, that died to foodborne illness in the United States, and our job is to make sure that doesn’t happen. And while we continue to see these things go up, the issue is you have to continue to look forward. A lot of these companies didn’t have a problem for 100 years until they had a problem. And I think that’s why it’s important when you look at what we do with our environmental monitoring programs, our risk assessments to help these customers continue to look forward and that backwards and rest on kind of where they are because the world is constantly changing. And whether — to your point, whether it’s environmental change, where all of a sudden you’ve got plants that it wasn’t never flooded before, it wasn’t as humid, now it’s more humid. Those are all risk assessments that we have to update, help our customers update to continue to protect the food supply. So, I’ll let Dave talk specifically about the hurricanes, but I just want to make sure that two major things happened in this quarter we need to keep an eye on.
Dave Naemura: Yeah, Brandon, I don’t have a quantification of the recent storms in the South. Obviously, the results of Milton here are pretty fresh. And so, it’s something we’re keeping an eye on the logistical impacts and other things at this stage, but I don’t have a quantification at this time.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from Thomas DeBourcy with Nephron Research. Your line is now open.
Thomas DeBourcy: Hi, guys. Can you hear me all right?
John Adent: Yeah. Tom DeBourcy, I can hear you.
Thomas DeBourcy: Okay, great. So, my question is, I guess, around the Chief Commercial Officer position that you’re creating, I know it’s kind of being carved out of an existing role, but — and I guess kind of — it seems like it ties together at an opportunistic time where maybe both your end markets have been cyclically weaker and now we’re kind of going back to a period of strikes and revenue generation opportunities, you may be meeting with more customers that are more receptive to offerings. And so, how are you thinking about both the C-suite role, but then also what else Neogen could do in terms of, I guess, additional revenue generation and new customer acquisition?
John Adent: Yeah, great. No, thanks, Tom. A couple of things with that. I think that’s why we’re splitting it to a Chief Commercial Officer role and not a Chief Operating Officer role, because we see the opportunity to continue to focus. And the reason we’re able to do that is because Doug did such a fantastic job when he was here building out his team. And we have a really, really strong Vice President of Operations that we are very happy to have on board. Jim has been with us over a year or right around a year, and is making tremendous impact. And so, it gives us great confidence in him running the operational side and really then hiring someone that’s going to focus fully on demand generation. And for those who don’t know, I’ve worked with Doug for over a decade. He’s done a great job. We’re really happy that he’s got the opportunity to retire and do some other things that he wanted to do and I’m even happy that he built such a strong team that’s allowing us to make these types of organizational moves in a way that is planned and allows us to meet the needs of the business going forward.
Thomas DeBourcy: Got it. Just I guess as a follow-up to the cost side, kind of, I guess, the ongoing portfolio review, as I think about part of the 3M business you acquired, it seems like there were some areas where you might have some overlapping products and whether there’s some, I guess, consolidation opportunities or maybe they serve different customers, but then also how you’re looking at potential lower-margin products and whether exiting those products are selling subproducts maybe a good return on capital?
John Adent: Yeah. No, I think that’s right, Tom. And we’ve done some of that already. I mean it’s not something that we went out and publicized, but we paired some of the — we’ve already worked with customers in the new bar to pair some lines that we’ve got from 3M. We have — but we also have to look at that with our own portfolio, right? And that’s something that we told you we’ve been working on for the last year. And while we don’t have anything to announce today, it’s something that we continue to focus on and continue to evaluate, because we’re looking at where we get the greatest return for our capital. So, capital allocation right now is really important for us and making sure that we are investing in the areas where the greatest return is what we’re laser-focused on right now.
Thomas DeBourcy: And then just maybe the last question. Geographically, China has continued to be a focus on the animal health, animal safety side, whether it’s African swine fever or other issues that obviously have been happening over the last few years. Just how do you view kind of the importance of that market for Neogen’s growth? That will do it for me.
John Adent: Yeah. I think, Tom, looking at the Asia Pacific region in whole is more important for us. It is a tremendous growth opportunity for us in a lot of different markets. We’ve got a really strong team in Japan. We’ve got a strong team in Korea. We’re building out a strong team in the Philippines. We’ve got a strong team in Thailand. We’ve got a strong team in China. So, we’re not reliant on just China for our growth. And as you know, China has been challenging, which has been good, because we have such a broad mix and such a broad sales mix across that region. So, we’re really focusing on Asia Pacific. And as Dave talked about earlier, really all of our international regions, that’s where we’re placing our money to expand those teams internationally because we have such low market share. And we’ve seen really good opportunities for that. You continue to see — we’ve seen Japan, which is our largest market, single country outside the U.S. turn the corner and start to grow again, which we’re excited about. We’ve continued to see significant growth in LatAm. We continue to see growth in Europe. And if those markets continue to outgrow North America, we’re going to continue to invest in those markets.
Thomas DeBourcy: Great. Thank you. That’s it for me. Appreciate it.
John Adent: Thank you, Tom.
Operator: There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call over to John for closing remarks.
John Adent: Again, thank you very much for joining. And like we talked about, as we saw this quarter, it shows the relevancy of Neogen to protect the world’s food supply because you’ve — we saw major companies have very significant issues that have affected a lot of consumers in the U.S. specifically. So, we’re continuing to show that we are the leader in the space. We continue to develop new and innovative solutions to help those customers understand what their risks are and how to mitigate those within their facilities. So, thank you very much, and we will see you again at the next call.
Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes your conference call for today. We thank you for participating and ask that you please disconnect your lines.
This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.
